Turkey Can Now Send Its Army to Saudi Arabia Under the Mecca Pact
A NATO member just bound itself by treaty to fight for Saudi Arabia, and the president who leads that NATO member spends most of his public life accusing Israel of genocide. That is the news Israel woke up to this week, and the loudest reactions to it are already the wrong ones.
Turkey's parliament ratified the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement by a vote of 279 to 119. The treaty was signed in Mecca in August by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and its core promise is the same promise at the heart of NATO: an armed attack on one member is treated as an attack on all three. The grouping now has a secretariat based in Saudi Arabia and a retired Pakistani general as its first secretary general. It binds its members for a decade.
The ratification matters because it turns a signing ceremony into a legal obligation. Ankara can now send military support to Riyadh while the Houthis keep firing at Saudi cities, oil facilities and shipping lanes. Turkish officials were careful to insist the alliance is purely defensive, that Turkey will not be dragged anywhere against its will, and that sending actual troops would require a separate vote in parliament. Meanwhile the alliance is growing. Syria's foreign minister says Damascus is in talks to join, Syrian and Saudi defense ministries just signed a military cooperation agreement during President Ahmad al Sharaa's visit to Riyadh, Egypt has shown interest, and regional analysts expect Qatar and Kuwait to be approached next. So what actually changed this week, and what should Israel do about it?
What is the Mecca pact and why did Turkey ratify it now?
Arab states do not write mutual defense treaties against neighbors who leave them alone. Saudi Arabia did not spend a year assembling a military bloc because of settlements in Judea and Samaria. It did it because Iranian missiles and Iranian built drones kept landing on Saudi soil, because the Houthis closed shipping lanes and hit Saudi airports, and because Riyadh concluded that American protection arrives late and leaves early. Pakistan brings the largest conventional army in the Muslim world and a nuclear arsenal. Turkey brings a serious defense industry and the political weight of NATO membership. Saudi Arabia brings money, legitimacy and the holiest sites in Islam.
For two decades Israel was lectured that the central problem of the region was Jewish sovereignty, and that solving the Palestinian file would unlock Arab cooperation on everything else. The region has now spent a year organizing its collective defense around the exact threat Israel named, in the exact way Israel described, while the Palestinian file sits untouched. Egypt is weighing how to help defend Saudi Arabia from Iran's proxy. Syria, which spent fifty years as Iran's forward base, is asking to join a bloc built to keep Iran out. That is a verdict on the Israeli argument, and it was delivered by Arab capitals rather than by anyone in Jerusalem.
This pact is a long way from an Islamic NATO. The three members do not agree on who the enemy is. Turkey watches Syria and the eastern Mediterranean, Pakistan watches India and Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia watches Iran, Yemen and the Red Sea. Pakistan has a poor record of showing up: it refused to join the Saudi war in Yemen, it did not respond militarily when Iranian weapons struck Saudi oil facilities, and its forces reached the kingdom this year only once fighting had already paused. Saudi security frameworks have historically lived on paper, and Israeli analysts who study Riyadh closely believe the main payoff Saudi Arabia wants is diplomatic standing and better bargaining leverage with Washington. Pakistan's warheads are aimed at India, and nothing in this treaty automatically stretches them over Riyadh or Ankara.
Is the Mecca pact aimed at Israel?
A senior Israeli official has already told reporters the alliance is aimed at Israel. Pakistan's defense minister has called Israel a threat and called for a united military front. I understand the instinct, and I think the instinct is leading Israel toward the wrong worry.
Nobody in this pact is going to fight Israel on behalf of anybody else. Saudi Arabia wants calm, tourists and capital, not a war with the strongest military in the Middle East. Pakistan wants a deterrent story it can sell against India. Turkey has had thirty years of military cooperation agreements with Israel and still never fired a shot at it. The mutual defense clause is the least dangerous sentence in the document.
The realistic danger is smaller and much more likely, which is why it deserves attention. Turkey now holds a permanent seat inside a Gulf security body, and Turkey is the one member whose main use for that seat is leverage against Jerusalem. Erdogan has spent two years trying to make hostility to Israel the admission fee for membership in the Sunni world, and an alliance with a secretariat, a secretary general and an expanding roster of candidates gives him an institution to try it in. A bloc whose members disagree about everything else will be tempted to find unity in the one subject they can all denounce. That is the scenario Israel can actually influence.
The way to influence it is to stop campaigning against the pact in public. Israel should deepen the relationship with the UAE, which was never invited to join and is openly wary of Pakistan's coziness with Tehran and of Turkish influence in the Gulf. Israel should repair relations with Egypt now rather than after Cairo signs, because an Egyptian signature on a treaty of this kind raises real questions about a peace treaty that has held for almost fifty years. And on Syria, Israel should attach a price: a government asking to enter a defense bloc while Israeli families live within artillery range of its southern provinces can demonstrate good faith by demilitarizing those provinces first.
Here is what to watch next, and it is not the speeches. Watch whether Turkey's parliament actually passes a deployment mandate and whether Turkish soldiers land in Saudi Arabia. Watch whether Damascus signs. Watch whether that new secretariat produces an integrated air defense plan or produces press releases. One of those outcomes reshapes the region and the other one fills a filing cabinet.
Iran spent a decade building proxies and firing missiles in order to isolate Israel in the Muslim world. What it produced instead is a Muslim military alliance assembling itself against Iran, with Egypt circling it and Syria asking to be let in. Israel should have the discipline to stay out of the way and let Tehran keep paying for its own encirclement.
Comments